Physical Presence Requirements in Assessments Policy
Institute of Applied Psychology
Last updated on 23 Nov, 2025
1. Purpose
This policy provides guidance on managing assessment conditions that explicitly require physical presence or face-to-face interaction between the candidate and another person (client, colleague, participant, etc.). It ensures IAP maintains the integrity of nationally recognised training products while supporting students to meet these mandatory requirements.
2. Scope
This policy applies to:
All IAP units of competency where assessment conditions explicitly specify physical presence requirements
All trainers and assessors conducting such assessments
All students enrolled in units with physical presence requirements
Student support staff assisting students with these assessments
3. Policy Statement
IAP acknowledges that some units of competency include mandatory assessment conditions requiring the candidate and another person to be physically present in the same location. These requirements reflect essential industry competencies and cannot be substituted with online or remote alternatives without compromising the integrity of the training product.
Where training package or unit assessment conditions explicitly require physical presence, IAP will not approve alternative assessment methods such as video conferencing (Zoom, Teams, etc.) as substitutes for physical presence, as such adjustments may result in assessment of different competencies than those specified in the training package.
IAP is committed to supporting all students to meet physical presence requirements through practical assistance, flexible arrangements, and creative problem-solving within the boundaries of training package compliance.
4. Definitions
Physical Presence Requirements: Assessment conditions that explicitly state the candidate and another person must be physically present in the same location/room during assessment. Common wording includes:
"physically present in the same room"
"face-to-face situations where candidate and [client/colleague] are physically present"
"in-person interaction"
"candidate and [other person] must be co-located"
Assessment Conditions: Mandatory requirements specified in the unit of competency that define how assessment must be conducted to ensure valid judgement of competency.
5. Identifying Units with Physical Presence Requirements
5.1 Assessor Responsibility
Before delivering any unit, assessors must:
Review the assessment conditions on training.gov.au
Identify whether physical presence is explicitly required
Plan assessment strategies that accommodate this requirement
Brief students on the requirement during unit orientation
5.2 Common Units with Physical Presence Requirements
Examples include (but are not limited to):
CHCCSL001 - Establish and confirm the counselling relationship
CHCCSL002 - Apply specialist interpersonal and counselling interview skills
CHCCSL003
CHCCSL004 - Research and apply personality theory
CHCCSL005
CHCCSL006
Other counselling, coaching, and interpersonal skills units
This list should be reviewed when new units are added to IAP's scope of registration.
6. What is NOT Acceptable as an Alternative
For units with explicit physical presence requirements, IAP will NOT approve:
❌ Video conferencing (Zoom, Teams, Skype, etc.)
❌ Telephone-based assessment
❌ Email or written correspondence
❌ Any other remote or virtual assessment method
❌ Pre-recorded videos
❌ Virtual reality or simulated environments (unless specifically approved in assessment conditions)
Rationale: These alternatives assess different competencies (telehealth, remote communication) rather than the face-to-face interpersonal skills specified in the unit requirements.
7. Support Strategies IAP Will Provide
7.1 During Pre-Enrolment
Student Support will:
Clearly communicate physical presence requirements for relevant units
Discuss the student's capacity to access appropriate people for assessment
Explain what support IAP can provide
Identify potential barriers early
Recommend alternative training pathways if requirements cannot be met
7.2 During Training and Assessment
IAP will provide:
Extended Timeframes
Flexible assessment scheduling to allow time for students to arrange suitable participants
Reasonable extensions where students are making genuine efforts
Option to complete other units first while arranging physical presence requirements
Connection to Potential Participants
Facilitation of connections with fellow students (where appropriate)
Links to community organisations and volunteer groups
Access to professional networks and industry contacts
Practical Guidance
Suggestions for appropriate people to approach
Briefing materials for participants
Support with ethical and privacy considerations
7.3 Creative Solutions Within Compliance
Assessors are encouraged to be creative within the boundaries of assessment conditions:
✅ Acceptable Variations (where not contradicting assessment conditions):
Using fellow students as clients/participants (where appropriate)
IAP staff or volunteers as simulated clients
Community group members
Family members (where appropriate to the context)
Colleagues from student's workplace
Multiple shorter assessment sessions
Assessment outside standard hours
Assessment at student's workplace (where suitable)
8. Process When Student Reports Difficulty
8.1 Initial Response
When a student indicates they cannot arrange physical presence, the assessor must:
Understand the specific barrier
What efforts have been made?
What specific challenge exists?
What resources has the student accessed?
Document thoroughly
Student's attempts to date
People/organisations approached
Reasons for unsuccessful attempts
Timeline of efforts
Problem-solve collaboratively
Review all potential participants
Consider timing alternatives
Explore IAP resources
Connect with student support services
8.2 Graduated Support Approach
Stage 1: Student-Led Solutions (Weeks 1-2)
Student approaches personal networks
Assessor/Support provides guidance and templates
Student documents attempts
Stage 2: IAP-Facilitated Solutions (Weeks 3-4)
Student Support assists with connections
IAP facilitates access to volunteers/community groups
Consider use of simulated workplace participants
Explore workplace-based assessment options
Stage 3: Assessment Planning Review (Week 5+)
Review Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) options
Consider deferral with extended timeline
Evaluate whether completion of other units first would help
Document all attempts and decisions
8.3 Documentation Required
All cases must be documented in the student's file including:
Initial discussion and barrier identification
Support strategies provided
Student's efforts and outcomes
IAP's facilitation attempts
Final outcome and assessment plan
Communications with student
9. Alternative Pathways
9.1 Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)
If a student has substantial workplace experience demonstrating the competency through face-to-face practice:
Consider RPL assessment instead
Gather evidence from authentic workplace performance
Ensure evidence demonstrates physical presence competency
Follow IAP's RPL Policy and procedures
9.2 Extended Timelines
Negotiate realistic extended timeframe
Set milestone check-ins
Maintain regular communication
Document extension approval
9.3 Deferral
Option to complete other units first
Return to challenging unit when circumstances change
Maintain enrolment status
Follow IAP's deferral procedures
9.4 Alternative Training Pathways
If physical presence requirements cannot be met:
Discuss alternative qualifications that may be suitable
Provide career counselling
Support transition to appropriate program
Ensure transparent communication
10. When All Options Are Exhausted
In rare circumstances where all alternatives have been genuinely exhausted and thoroughly documented:
Do NOT default to online assessment
Do escalate to Compliance Manager
Consider seeking regulator guidance
Evaluate whether the student can realistically complete the unit
Communicate honestly with the student about options
Any deviation from physical presence requirements must:
Be supported by legal/compliance advice
Be approved by Chief Executive Officer
Be fully documented with comprehensive rationale
Be prepared for regulatory scrutiny at audit
Note: Such circumstances should be extremely rare. If patterns emerge of multiple students unable to meet requirements, this indicates a need for review of recruitment, pre-enrolment processes, or training design.
11. Responsibilities
11.1 Trainers and Assessors
Identify physical presence requirements in units
Communicate requirements clearly to students
Provide practical support and guidance
Document student efforts and IAP support
Maintain assessment integrity
Escalate unresolved cases
11.2 Student Support Team
Discuss requirements during pre-enrolment
Connect students with resources
Facilitate participant recruitment
Coordinate access to IAP facilities
Monitor at-risk students
11.3 Compliance Manager
Maintain list of units with physical presence requirements
Provide guidance on assessment conditions interpretation
Review escalated cases
Ensure documentation meets audit standards
Seek regulator guidance when necessary
11.4 Chief Executive Officer
Final approval for any exceptional circumstances
Ensure policy compliance across IAP
Oversee regulatory relationships
12. Quality Assurance and Monitoring
IAP will monitor:
Number of students reporting difficulty with physical presence requirements
Effectiveness of support strategies
Success rates in meeting requirements
Documentation quality
Assessment integrity maintenance
Annual review will evaluate:
Whether pre-enrolment information is adequate
Whether support strategies are effective
Whether patterns indicate systemic issues
Whether policy updates are needed
13. Related Policies and Documents
Assessment Policy
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy
Student Support Policy
Reasonable Adjustments for Assessments Policy
Standards for RTOs 2025
Relevant training.gov.au unit pages
14. Review
This policy will be reviewed:
Annually, or
Following changes to the Standards for RTOs, or
Following regulatory feedback or audit findings, or
When patterns indicate policy effectiveness issues
Policy Owner: Compliance Manager
Approved by: Chief Executive Officer
Date of Approval: [To be completed]
Next Review Date: [To be completed]
Version: 1.0
Appendix A: Quick Reference for Assessors
Step-by-Step Response to "I can't get someone physically present"
1. Clarify and Document (Same day)
What have you tried?
Who have you approached?
What's the specific barrier?
Document their response
2. Provide Guidance (Week 1)
Suggest appropriate people to approach
Provide recruitment templates
Explain what makes a suitable participant
Set timeline for student-led attempts
3. Check Progress (Week 2)
Review student's efforts
Identify obstacles
Adjust approach if needed
4. Escalate to Student Support (Week 3)
Request facilitation assistance
Explore IAP resources
Consider simulated workplace options
5. Explore Alternatives (Week 4+)
RPL assessment
Extended timeline
Deferral
Complete other units first
6. Escalate to Compliance (If unresolved)
Comprehensive documentation required
All alternatives attempted
Student Support involvement confirmed
Common Suitable Participants
Depending on the unit context:
Fellow IAP students
Family members (where appropriate)
Friends or colleagues
Workplace colleagues
Community group members
Professional association contacts
Red Flags Requiring Escalation
⚠️ Student has made no genuine efforts
⚠️ Student requests online assessment as first option
⚠️ Assessor unclear on assessment conditions
⚠️ Multiple students in same unit having same issue
⚠️ Pressure to compromise assessment integrity
Key Message to Students
"Physical presence is a mandatory requirement for this unit because it assesses your ability to work face-to-face with clients, which is essential for professional practice. We're here to help you meet this requirement through flexible scheduling, access to facilities, and connections to suitable participants. Let's work together to find a solution that maintains the quality of your qualification."